Joined

·
481 Posts

thanks for the help in advance.:letsdrink

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

Joined

·
481 Posts

thanks for the help in advance.:letsdrink

Joined

·
4,124 Posts

Joined

·
481 Posts

Joined

·
4,124 Posts

when you are out there you can swap your datumsback and forth on your gps. if you want to come by the house we can look though the numbers i have and see what we can find. also mbt has quite a list on their website and if you stop by their shop i think they have them plotted out on a map.

Joined

·
481 Posts

:bump

Joined

·
481 Posts

can someone please answer this question?

Joined

·
1,863 Posts

Probably more info than you need, but a spheroid is the grid a particular system lays over the earth. Different spheroids have different starting points and orientations, so they don't match up, so you get errors if you use one when you should be using another.

Joined

·
4,124 Posts

Similar to WGS 84 is the North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83). This is the official horizontal datum for use in the North and Central American geodetic networks. Like WGS 84, it is based on the GRS 80 ellipsoid so the two have very similar measurements. NAD 83 was also developed using satellite and remote sensing imagery and is the default datum on most GPS units today.

Joined

·
10,098 Posts

http://boulter.com/gps/

Just put the numbers into the converter and pick the one that it converts it to. No it wont convert LORAN numbers.

Joined

·
481 Posts

Thanks for all the info!

Joined

·
4,124 Posts

Not much difference!

Ref: North American Datum of 1983

NOAA Professional Paper NOS 2

Charles R. Schwarz, Editor

U.S. Department of Commerce

by:Sam Wormley [email protected] 3/7/97

<HR><CENTER><A name=1.4>1.4 How do I convert between NAD83 and WGS 84?</CENTER>

I think the proposition of doing a "datum shift" between NAD83 and WGS84 is a waste of time. The difference between the two is the philosophy of how an inertial datum should be defined, and is ignored by all but a handful of geodesists that are working at extraordinary levels of accuracy.

The ellipsoid of the World Geodetic System of 1984 is defined by four constants, one being the "bar C sub 20" Normalized Second Degree Zonal Harmonic Coefficient of the Gravitational Potential - the "J2" term is computed. The ellipsoid of the Geodetic Reference System of 1980 is defined by four constants, one being the "J2" Dynamical Form Factor - the "bar C sub 20" term is computed.

Geoid models (EGM96 versus GEOID96) will yield meaningful differences in ellipsoid/geoid separations (vertical) for North America, horizontal positions will not reflect anything beyond micro-fractions of a millimeter at best.

The differences between the semi-minor axes are computational (secondary DEPENDENT) variables based on different definitions of the gravity field. They are called "Derived Geometric Constants." The semi-major axis of the WGS84 ellipsoid is known to an accuracy of plus or minus two meters.

Transformations based on a derived difference of a tenth of a millimeter with an constant's accuracy of two meters is, IMHO, silly.

"Therefore, as long as the preceding is recognized, it can be stated that WGS84 and NAD83 are based on the same ellipsoid."

whats wrong you dont trust your old fishing/surveyor buddy?</A>

Joined

·
4,124 Posts

i did and its coolsealark (1/29/2010)Did anyone try the converter that I posted the link to?

but it does not convert datum to datum. it converts one datum to degrees minutes and seconds, decimal degrees and degrees and decimal minutes and plots it on a map.

but it is still cool

Joined

·
481 Posts

Thanks Mark:letsdrink!nextstep (1/29/2010)again you are worrying too much, let me try this again

Not much difference!

Ref: North American Datum of 1983

NOAA Professional Paper NOS 2

Charles R. Schwarz, Editor

U.S. Department of Commerce

by:Sam Wormley [email protected] 3/7/97

<HR><CENTER><A name=1.4>1.4 How do I convert between NAD83 and WGS 84?</CENTER>

I think the proposition of doing a "datum shift" between NAD83 and WGS84 is a waste of time. The difference between the two is the philosophy of how an inertial datum should be defined, and is ignored by all but a handful of geodesists that are working at extraordinary levels of accuracy.

The ellipsoid of the World Geodetic System of 1984 is defined by four constants, one being the "bar C sub 20" Normalized Second Degree Zonal Harmonic Coefficient of the Gravitational Potential - the "J2" term is computed. The ellipsoid of the Geodetic Reference System of 1980 is defined by four constants, one being the "J2" Dynamical Form Factor - the "bar C sub 20" term is computed.

Geoid models (EGM96 versus GEOID96) will yield meaningful differences in ellipsoid/geoid separations (vertical) for North America, horizontal positions will not reflect anything beyond micro-fractions of a millimeter at best.

The differences between the semi-minor axes are computational (secondary DEPENDENT) variables based on different definitions of the gravity field. They are called "Derived Geometric Constants." The semi-major axis of the WGS84 ellipsoid is known to an accuracy of plus or minus two meters.

Transformations based on a derived difference of a tenth of a millimeter with an constant's accuracy of two meters is, IMHO, silly.

"Therefore, as long as the preceding is recognized, it can be stated that WGS84 and NAD83 are based on the same ellipsoid."

whats wrong you dont trust your old fishing/surveyor buddy?

</A>

Yeah I probably am worrying too much. But I'm going to be paddling about 2 miles to get to the spots and I just wanna make sure they are gonna be there. Circling around for a while looking in a boat is a little diff than having to paddle more than I need too:hotsun. I can't wait til it warms up and when snapper season opens!

Dustin

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

Join the discussion

Pensacola Fishing Forum

Pensacola Fishing Community and Forum Featuring Helpful Forums, Links, News, and other Resources.

Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!