[Play'N Hooky Too]

Rooster21 (1/23/2010)I liked woody in person, never followed the posts that got everyone ruffled to the point of pissed.

Sad to see it happen

+1

 

[Play'N Hooky Too]

Burnt Drag (1/23/2010)Do any other object to this "rating" system that encourages members to 'serial' post? Its like members post the same way some people just talk until they have something to say. There are also many over-cooked icons such as the idiot smiley face holding up the beer mug. That one insults my intelligence and just evokes a feeling that the poster is interested in minimal content and maximum drunk. It gives people who drink a bad name. Some members seem to spend more than 12 hours a day monitoring and posting. And we get to see pictures of their boats everytime they post. There is a lot to like about the forum. But it looks like a lot of members home lives are sufferiing becuase they spend more time on here than with family. 2 morepennies.

Jim

You mean this one?:letsdrink

Actually, I think it is a cocktail glass. oke

 

[Play'N Hooky Too]

Jamielu (1/24/2010)

You mean this one?:letsdrink

Actually, I think it is a cocktail glass. oke [/quote]

Dude, come on! We just took a vote over here, and we've got three who say that's a Collins glass!!!okeoke[/quote]





Why yes, I do believe you're correct.:letsdrink :letsdrink:letsparty

As far as the issue at hand, I did not see the posts immediately leading up to the banning so I really can't judge one way or the other. I would have to assume that they were much worse than the onesmade in the past under thatscreen name, otherwise what would be the point of banning him now.I know there were alot of people who were disappointed to find out that it was him, but I wouldhope that he didn't get banned for the offense of having his identity exposed by someone with a personal vendetta against him.The list of people hiding behind a screen name to talk s**t on this forum is, I'm sure, quite extensive. Just my $0.02