Volumes discharged counterpoint to doomsday estimates - Pensacola Fishing Forum

Go Back   Pensacola Fishing Forum > General Discussion > General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-24-2010, 06:14 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 856
Default Volumes discharged counterpoint to doomsday estimates

This is from a petro engineer from the Univ of Texas....seems to have some validity maybe wishful thinking.....</h1></h1>BP Spill May Be Less Than Doomsayers Think: Tadeusz W. Patzek</h1><span id=pubDate class=date>June 22, 2010, 9:30 PM EDT <h2>More From Businessweek</h2><ul>[*]BP Shares Rise as Much as 6.6% in London Trading On LA Report[*]BP?s Gulf Costs Accelerate as Cleanup Work Peaks: Chart of Day[*]A Dead Zone Was Already in the Gulf[*]BP Default Swaps Rise on Concerns Storm May Disrupt Oil Cleanup[*]BP Puts Gulf Well Manager on Leave Pending U.S. Investigations[/list]<h2>Story Tools</h2><ul><LI id=stEmail>e-mail this story <LI id=stPrint>print this story <LI id=stDigg>digg this <LI id=stDelicious>save to del.icio.us <LI id=stBX>add to Business Exchange[/list]Commentary by Tadeusz W. Patzek

<p class=indent>June 23 (Bloomberg) -- Two months have passed since the blowout of the BP Plc exploratory Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico. Much more is now known about a string of fateful decisions taken in the course of drilling this well.</p><p class=indent>Individually, none of BP?s decisions would have caused the blowout, but their confluence led almost inevitably to the largest oil-related tragedy in U.S. history. Eleven people have died, a whole coastal region of the Gulf of Mexico has been devastated and it is uncertain that BP will survive the ordeal.</p><p class=indent>There is some good news, however: Most of the oil and gas spewing from the failed well is now being captured by BP engineers. Here is why.</p><p class=indent>On June 17, video feeds showed oil and gas to be still escaping from the containment hat attached to the failed blowout preventer (BOP) on top of the well. The brown part of the plume consists of oil droplets, while the white bubbles are gas encapsulated in hydrate ice skins. These ice-gas bubbles eventually dissolve in seawater, thus they never reach the ocean surface.</p><p class=indent>I have watched the BP video feeds for weeks. The plume currently overflowing the top hat is significantly smaller and less violent than the initial oil and gas plume emanating from the broken riser. This suggests that a large portion of the well flow is now being produced in a controlled fashion.</p><p class=indent>On June 16, BP finally managed to connect the choke and kill lines below the BOP to a surface collection system onboard the Q4000 vessel. Both production lines (the top-hat riser and the choke-and-kill line riser) are capable of collecting around 25,000 barrels of oil and 30 million standard cubic feet of gas daily. Correcting volumes for the pressure difference between the sea bottom and the surface, the total flow of oil and gas through the BOP should be about 35,000 barrels a day, not 60,000 barrels a day as some claim.</p><p class=center>Increased Flow</p><p class=indent>There are two reasons why the oil flow rate from the failed BP well may have increased from the initial 9,000 to 22,000 barrels a day, the amount estimated to have been leaking in May. First, the partially closed rams and rubber rings functioning as flow barriers in the BOP may have been eroded by oil and gas, and perhaps sand. Second, ?wormholes,? or meandering flow tubes that connect the reservoir and the well, may have formed.</p><p class=indent>?Wormholes? are created when sandstone crumbles and washes away because either the oil and gas flow rate is high, or the reservoir oil is highly viscous, like cold molasses. The combined effect of rock and well erosion might have increased oil flow from about 20,000 to 30,000 barrels a day.</p><p class=center>Soil in the Rain</p><p class=indent>The physics of this phenomenon, akin to washing soil away by rain, is nicely described on The Oil Drum website. Gas is an additional 50 percent of the total flow and is often conflated with the oil flow. As I indicated at the beginning, gas dissolves in the seawater at depth and doesn?t reach the ocean surface.</p><p class=indent>For the sake of perspective, consider the BP Thunder Horse platform, the world?s largest semisubmersible facility. Prior to the disastrous spill it was also the most productive platform in the Gulf of Mexico, located in water that?s about 6,050 feet (1,844 meters) deep. As of March 20, 2009, daily production at this platform was approximately 260,000 barrels of oil and 210.5 million standard cubic feet of natural gas a day from seven wells, an average of 37,000 barrels of oil and 30 million standard cubic feet of gas per well.</p><p class=indent>The former Minerals Management Service reports that the majority of ultra-deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico produce around 20,000 barrels of oil a day, with the best well in the entire region producing 41,000 barrels a day.</p><p class=center>Failure Not Likely</p><p class=indent>Unless there has been a complete failure of the central 7- inch production casing -- which I don?t believe has occurred -- then no reason exists to believe the failed Macondo well is producing 60,000 barrels of oil a day.</p><p class=indent>Based on the available information and calculations, it is highly probable that the failed BP well is producing oil at a rate that is closer to 20,000 or 30,000 barrels of oil a day. If BP is currently collecting 25,000 barrels a day, then only some 5,000 barrels of oil are being spilled in the Gulf waters.</p><p class=indent>Based on the evidence presented thus far, it seems quite unlikely that 60,000 to 150,000 barrels of oil a day will ever flow from the Macondo well. By controlling the spill rate, BP has gained the breathing room required to successfully complete the bottom kill using the relief wells. I anxiously await the good news that the Macondo well has ceased flowing.</p><p class=indent>(Tadeusz W. Patzek is chairman of the petroleum and geosystems engineering department at the University of Texas- Austin. The opinions expressed are his own.)</p>--Editors: James Greiff, Laurence Arnold.

Click on ?Send Comment? in the sidebar display to send a letter to the editor.

To contact the author of this column: Tadeusz W. Patzek at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this column: James Greiff at [email protected]

<h2>Sponsored Links</h2>
Xiphius is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Sponsored Links
Old 06-24-2010, 06:20 PM   #2
Senior Member
sniper's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: P-Cola, FL
Posts: 2,422
Default RE: Volumes discharged counterpoint to doomsday estimates

Reviewed and editied by Tony Hayward
sniper is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Pensacola Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
How Did You Find Us?
Tell us how you heard about Pensacola Fishing Forum.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.