|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Ruby Red Lip
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 61
|
Ahoy,
The Council met last week in Mobile, Alabama. The following is a brief description of what came out of that meeting. Just a reminder; any final action taken by the Council must be approved by NOAA Fisheries before it is implemented. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me directly at: Emily.muehlstein@gulfcouncil.org Your Chum, Emily Muehlstein Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Red Snapper The Council voted to increase the red snapper Annual Catch Limit from 7,185, 000 pounds to 8,080,000 pounds in 2012. If the 2012 Annual Catch Limit is not exceeded it will increase again to 8,690,000 pounds in 2013. The Council tabled discussions on a regulatory amendment that considered making adjustments to the red snapper season structure by exploring weekend or weekday only fishing options. For those of you trying to make summer fishing plans: NOAA Fisheries is expected to announced the predicted length of this years red snapper season sometime this spring. Amberjack The Council has decided to delay action on Reef Fish Amendment 35 until its April meeting in Corpus Christi, Texas. The Councils current preferred alternatives would: • Set the Annual Catch Limit at 1,780,000 pounds and the Annual Catch Target at 1,539,000 lbs. • Retain the recreational 30’’ minimum size limit and June-July season closure. • Establish a 2000 lbs commercial trip limit and retain the March-May commercial season closure. To learn more about this proposed amendment watch the online presentation, check out the public hearing guide, or tackle the full amendment. Then, share your comments with the Council using the online comment form. All of these resources can be found on the proposed amendments section of our webpage at: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/fishery_m...ementation.php Spiny Lobster The Council cannot authorize activities that put threatened or endangered species at risk. To protect staghorn and elkhorn corals that were put at risk by commercial spiny lobster fishing activities the Council decided to prohibit spiny lobster trapping in a number of areas off the Florida Keys. The Council worked with the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and the commercial fishing industry to identify closed areas that would protect corals while causing the least amount of impact to fishing activities. The Gulf Council moved to approve the amendment and subdivide proposed closed areas 2, 15, and 30. The proposed closures (including the newly amended sites) will create a total of about 5.9 square miles of closed area. This amendment also contained an action that proposed commercial spiny lobster trap line marking requirements but the Gulf Council selected to take no action on the issue. The spiny lobster fishery is managed jointly with South Atlantic Fishery Management Council who will need to review and approve the amendment in March before it is finalized. Trigger Fish The latest gray triggerfish stock assessment determined that the stock is both overfished (population is too low) and undergoing overfishing (rate of removals is too high). The Gulf Council’s scientific advisors recommended that the gray triggerfish Acceptable Biological Catch be set at 305,300 pounds. As a rule, Annual Catch Limit cannot be higher than the Acceptable Biological Catch, so the current stock Annual Catch Limit of 793,000 must be adjusted. Just for reference the total triggerfish catch from 2009 was 482,000 lbs and from 2010 was 352,000 lbs. The Council directed staff to prepare an interim rule that would reduce the gray triggerfish Annual Catch Limit and Annual Catch Target to align them with the new Acceptable Biological catch, as well as adjust the Accountability Measures to provide in-season closure authority to the regional administrator of NOAA Fisheries. The Council also directed staff to prepare a framework action to adjust the Annual Catch Target and Annual Catch Limits after the interim rule expires . The framework action will also consider making adjustments to the rebuilding plan by modifying management measures such as size limits and fishing seasons. Costal Migratory Pelagics The Council has decided to hold scoping meetings for two amendments for the Costal Migratory Pelagics Management Plan. Amendment 19 considers limiting the sale of recreationally caught fish and making changes to the permit requirements. Amendment 20 considers modifying commercial zone boundaries, changing the commercial opening date for the western zone, establishing a transit provision, and requiring vessel zone declarations. During scoping the council seeks suggestions and ideas from stakeholders about how to solve a fishery problem. The goal of scoping is to identify issues, potential impacts, and reasonable alternatives associated with the issues at hand so that reasonable management actions and alternatives can be developed. The Council will hold meetings in different towns across the Gulf Coast gather input on proposed amendments 19 and 20; details will be posed on our website soon. Crew Size and Income The Council took final action on an amendment that eliminates the requirement that 50% or more of your earned income must be from commercial or charter fishing activities to obtain or renew a commercial reef fish vessel permit. Also, this amendment increases the crew limit from 3 to 4 people on vessels that are permitted both commercially and as charter boats. Dealer Permits and Electronic Reporting The Council is working on an amendment that proposes some changes to seafood dealer reporting requirements. Scoping meetings will be held to gather input from stakeholders regarding: • What dealer permits would be required, and for which species? • How frequently and by what methods dealers should report? • What, if any, penalties should exist for non-reporting or late reporting? The scoping meetings for this amendment will be held with the scoping for the costal migratory pelagic amendments mentioned above. Details will be available on our website soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Mines Bigger
Sailfish
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fort Walton Beach
Posts: 1,243
|
I bet theses idiots get their data from public reefs that get fished 10 times a day. If you idiots wouldn't have closed snapper season, triggers wouldn't be getting over fished. I'm pretty sure I learned day 1 of science class when I was 8 that if you mess with one species population it will throw all the other species off.....
__________________
2002 236 Key Largo w/ 2011 200 optimax |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Snapper
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jefferson County, MO
Posts: 455
|
How is the data derived?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Snapper
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Milton fl.
Posts: 525
|
__________________
Jaw Jacker |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Trigger
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 385
|
agreed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Ruby Red Lip
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 33
|
HMMM no response from our chum yet either on these comments (grin) Got to be a treat woking for the Devil
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Snapper
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Trigger
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 219
|
One does have to wonder what the plan is once all the stock is thrown completely out of sync with nature?? Snapper have got to be eating anything hatching, moving or swimming. I don't think even lion fish will be able to survive gulf council decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Sailfish
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,470
|
Gandy girl is posting here pretty much as a favor to us to make the information readily available with out us having to look for it. I appreciate that and I have to give her credit for playing to a pretty harsh audience.
Reading posts here there isn't much doubt that serious thought, reason, raging emotions, lots of alcohol go into some of these posts and some are limited in the mixture mentioned. Most of us would like to influence the Gulf Council and NOAA at some point to give recreational anglers longer seasons, bigger bag limits while at the same time maintaining sustainable marine resources. I have no doubt that some of these posts have an influence on members of the Gulf Council and NOAA at some level. I'm having a real hard time trying to figure out how insulting the group at virtually every level as a whole, deserved or not can possibly influence them to even consider looking at the situation from our point of view. Much less even giving us the minutest of concessions. I think little old fashioned polite manners and courtesy will produce better results in the long run, that's my opinion. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
Recent Threads | ![]() |
| May 24th trolling (video) Dolphin and Wahoo.. by Downtime2 |
| Triggers??? by CobeKing |
| grass flats pensacola by darsinika |
| Fat Jax Report 5/27/12 (Shark Video) by Realtor |
| AR-15 A2 Upper FS by loadtoad1a7 |
| Late May Report Hopedale LA by CAPT. GENE DUGAS |
| MBGFC weigh ins? by Realtor |
| Looking for an old beat up jon boat by Breeze |
| muscovy ducks babies and adults by saintsfann76 |
| How fast - Red snapper by Outside9 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Recent Photos | ![]() |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
![]() |
![]() |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
| Bookmark & Share |
Digg this Thread! |
Add Thread to del.icio.us |
Bookmark in Technorati |
Tweet this thread |

