|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 | |
|
Senior Member
Grouper
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Senior Member
Trigger
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: adrift, but in full control
Posts: 318
|
the only thing worse than knowingly breaking a game law, and bragging about it, is another person advocating and defending it. pure trash.
dont have to like what i say. it is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Member
Ruby Red Lip
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 50
|
if the law is one fish per day, per angler, then i agree with the people that are getting upset. doesnt matter whos mouth it fed, cathching and keeping more than the limit is wrong.shooting 3 deer a day is wrong, even if you givem to your budies that didnt see anything allday.
if you wanted to feed some body, coulda bought em a big mac or somethin |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Senior Member
Mingo
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 196
|
Its funny, but sitting here reading all this crap I see some of the same people bashing Becker are the same ones that invite others along on a snapper trip just so they can "keep" more of the fish than normally allowed, they could have cared less if someone had a chance to actually fish. What about ALL of the party boats that go out with 30+ anglers, reel in whatever bites then bring the fish back and have them cleaned? You cant honestly tell me each and every person fishing keeps the fish they caught can you? I know for a fact of alot of tourists that come down and dont want to bother with carrying the fish meat back to wherever they live. So that means someone who didnt catch all that fish is getting the meat from it. Is that wrong?
And by the way if 3 hunters go out and two get skunked, I see nothing wrong with bringing back 3 deer. The other two hunters paid there dues by buying licenses and paying the taxes on the firearms and ammo and any other assorted BS they have to buy depending on where they are hunting. Now, in the same sense if one hunter killed 3 deer and brought all 3 home with him and then gave it away to whoever, well that would be wrong as it is against bag limits. As others have stated, if Becker gave the fish to other anglers with licenses and those who were legally able to posses one redfish, then what does it matter who caught it? The possession of one redfish is what the rule states, not who caught it. Meh, just my opinions, as I see it some people are not fortunate enough to be able to devote ALOT of time and money for the simple pleasure of catching a fresh fish and bringing it home for dinner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | ||
|
Senior Member
Mingo
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
I do not think it was a problem cause if you follow some of his posts, he falls under Alabama guidelines, and they are not as strict as Florida. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
Recent Threads | ![]() |
| May 24th trolling (video) Dolphin and Wahoo.. by Downtime2 |
| Triggers??? by CobeKing |
| grass flats pensacola by darsinika |
| Fat Jax Report 5/27/12 (Shark Video) by Realtor |
| AR-15 A2 Upper FS by loadtoad1a7 |
| Late May Report Hopedale LA by CAPT. GENE DUGAS |
| MBGFC weigh ins? by Realtor |
| Looking for an old beat up jon boat by Breeze |
| muscovy ducks babies and adults by saintsfann76 |
| How fast - Red snapper by Outside9 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Recent Photos | ![]() |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
![]() |
![]() |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
| Bookmark & Share |
Digg this Thread! |
Add Thread to del.icio.us |
Bookmark in Technorati |
Tweet this thread |

