Go Back   Pensacola Fishing Forum > Boating Topics > Boat Repair - Questions,Answers and Suggestions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2012, 02:14 PM   #1
Member
Ruby Red Lip
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 42
Default Qsm11 670hp

Splashed the HAYMAL, 1979 46' Hatteras, yesterday at barbers. So far we have removed old cats, 3176b 600hp, cleaned the engine room, replaced the batteries, removed shafts and had them straightened, installed new Michigan 4 blade wheels, reglassed and drilled new holes where shafts enter the hull, installed new drippless shaft seals, sanded and painted bottom and all running gear except wheels, installed two transom steps, waxed and buffed entire topside and hull sides, had one gear, zf350a resplined at zf in new orleons to match port side, and now we are back on shore power at Barbers Marina.

Before we cruised right at 20 knots at 1800 rpm burning 18.5 gallons per side.

Now to my question, the new QSM11 are 670 hp and weight around 500 lbs lighter per side. Therefore we are going to gain 140hp and lose 1000lbs. New bottom new wheels.

Any guesses out there on where we will cruise? Fuel consumption? David Massey did the new wheels and went conservative to protect the new engines.
Haymal is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Old 01-21-2012, 03:40 PM   #2
Senior Member
White Marlin
 
LITECATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: pensacola (native)
Posts: 3,433
Default

22 knot cruise. Much better fuel burn. That hull is not a fast hull no matter how much HP you put in it. Love the Cummins engines! Ya'll will love them! Man i sure would hate to pay that bill for all of that work! Good luck with her, those 46's are a beautiful boat.
__________________
Capt. Scott Byrd
36 Topaz
33 Concorde (for sale)
LITECATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 04:34 PM   #3
Member
Ruby Red Lip
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 42
Default

Thanks capt. I figured that's around where I would be. The fuel savings and the hopefully lack of major mechanical issues due to the new engines is really the payoff I'm excited about!
Haymal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 03:01 PM   #4
Senior Member
Snapper
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 524
Default

That's a heavy hull and losing the half ton is the same as running with approx 150 gallons less diesel. The balance of the boat is going to determine the speed. Sometimes less isn't better if it throws the weight/balance off. If I remember correctly, the 46 had just one big aft tank under the console floor. It may take more trim tabs now to keep the bow lower till you burn off some fuel.
__________________
NelsonMarineService.com
Located on the Sunny Beaches of Panama City Beach
TheCaptKen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 03:36 PM   #5
Member
Ruby Red Lip
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 42
Default

Thanks for the response. My boat has two tanks under the cockpit with the lazaret between them. I'll post my actual numbers after the install is complete. Until then tight lines!
Haymal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2