|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Cigar Minnow
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4
|
I currently have a 2002 Cape Horn 21 with a Yamaha 225 Saltwater series (240 hours) and I am looking at moving up to the Cape Horn 24 most likely with twin engines (years 2000-2005 before the body style change). Does anyone have first hand experience with both of these boats and can give some comparisons in the water, advantages/disadvantages of both, and if this a good move or not. I am looking at probable $10,000-13,000 to make the upgrade and want to make sure that this move is worth the money. I fish primarily out of Carrabelle, Fl
Appreciate anyone's help with this decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Grouper
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham/Destin
Posts: 693
|
My feedback is based on dated experience. CH builds great boats. In the early '90's a good friend bought a 19' then a 21', both were wet as hell, then he moved to the 24' that would have been a '97 or '98, she was awesome! Also, she was dry. It is my understanding that CH modified all its hulls after the 24's success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Sailfish
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: just a trollin along
Posts: 1,399
|
We had one for a few years and it was a great boat! We fished it hard and had it in some big weather and it did great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Cigar Minnow
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Sailfish
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: mobile, al
Posts: 1,912
|
yes it is worth the upgrade. we fished them both and the 24 is just a cadillac compared to the 21. we make 80 miles runs on a regular basis. good luck and post some reports when you get it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Mingo
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 108
|
I have fished a 19' a 21' and own a 24' Cape Horn. First while I agree with Magic236 that the 24' is a MUCH dryer boat than th 21 and 19, as well as substantially more stable with more fishing room, I'm always relunctant to characterize any center console as 'dry'.
I love my 24' CH- it is versatile enough to take considerable distances offshore and handles seas very well, but still manageable enough to tow easily (I launch by myself regularly) and it can get into essentially the same 'skinny' water the 21 and 19's can for Bay fishing or water sports. I think once you get much bigger than a 24' boat or a similar sized boat with a cabin, it starts becoming a lot more of a hassle to launch regularly, a drawback that has kept me from upgrading to date. As far as comparing the pre-2005 to the newer ones, (i have ridden on a newer 24' as well as a 27') I do not think there is a lot of difference in the ride- the primary change to the hull design itself seemed to be the a more pointed V in the front compared to a more pronounced flare on the front in the older version, probably resulting in a dryer ride. I can tell you that the boat handles great in a leeway sea and loves a following sea. Since the Cape Horn is not a capped boat there is absolutely no give so a forward sea well beat you up unless you slow down or trim the bow down. Anyway, my 1999 24' CH is for sale as well on craigslist- send me a PM and I can give you specifics. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Trigger
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pensacola fl
Posts: 238
|
look on craiglist you can prob find one some body got a little oil on for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Cigar Minnow
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4
|
Thanks guys for the real world experiences with both of these boats. I have had other people tell me that it's not worth the extra money to go the 24 especially since most have twin engines and that if you are are going to make a change then a 26-28 foot boat is much better.
I really like the 24 and think it is a versatile size. I am glad to here that there actually is that big of a difference between the 21 and 24 because I have been out in my 21 and sometimes it feels a little small for the ocean especially more than 15-20 miles out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Grouper
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hopefully bump trolling hardtails in the GOM
Posts: 988
|
Go for it. I have fished on every cape from a 17 thru the 31. They only get better as they get bigger. The twin engines is a huge plus!! And they are built like tanks. They don't break easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Trigger
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 352
|
love my 2000 model CH 24 1400 hours with 135 Opti's then repowered with twin 175 hp. Zukes.. (great combo) 450 + hrs. .. I sure don't need a bigger boat.. if it's 3 to 4 's or worse... we just don't go very far offshore or not at all..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
Recent Threads | ![]() |
| 3 Day Report! Wahoo and Amberjack! by Deep South Charters |
| wtt 25hp evinrude for ar or 1911 by bigboreshooter78 |
| tagging fish by kriss444 |
| Mounting windlass on 94 Albemarle 265 by slick1952 |
| LTB Remington 700 VTR .308 by jrmcallister |
| Adequate water pressure to the outboard? by fsu alex |
| Shimano Spheros Questions & Upgrades... by tofer |
| 30 carbine... by Allen Emmons |
| 2006 Grizzly 660 by JoshH |
| hello all by travisj1984 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Recent Photos | ![]() |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
![]() |
![]() |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
| Bookmark & Share |
Digg this Thread! |
Add Thread to del.icio.us |
Bookmark in Technorati |
Tweet this thread |

