Pensacola Fishing Forum - View Single Post

opus68 · 01-04-2008, 08:50 AM

Yes, it is a gen II, original to the boat, which is 18 months old, with 220 hours.

Would it be sufficient to document the routing of the line with pictures and send it to the company, along with the repair bills and maybe the pictures of the damage to the lower unit? I have yet to actually see the line routing myself. I really would like to get the boat back in the water, so i don't want to hold off on repairs until the company gets a chance to see the evidence and make their decision. The new drive is available today and he says it will be ready today.

By the way, who do you think is responsible? Is it Tahoe, the boat manufacturer, or mercury?

Thanks for the responses!

01-04-2008, 08:50 AM	#6
opus68 Senior Member Trigger Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 212	RE: Lower unit destroyed Yes, it is a gen II, original to the boat, which is 18 months old, with 220 hours. Would it be sufficient to document the routing of the line with pictures and send it to the company, along with the repair bills and maybe the pictures of the damage to the lower unit? I have yet to actually see the line routing myself. I really would like to get the boat back in the water, so i don't want to hold off on repairs until the company gets a chance to see the evidence and make their decision. The new drive is available today and he says it will be ready today. By the way, who do you think is responsible? Is it Tahoe, the boat manufacturer, or mercury? Thanks for the responses!